Native American Survival

http://www.nativecollections.com/outdoor survival.html

http://dmoz.org/Recreation/Outdoors/Surv ival_and_Primitive_Technology/Schools_an d_Courses/

(my favorite ones above)




http://www.wannalearn.com/Sports_and_Lei sure/Outdoor_Activities/Wilderness_Survi val/

hope these help

good luck

2006-12-17 16:03:33 by DELFINA

Native American history how they got food for there hungry family, How the Native American made there fish trap, The funnel opening will have to ...

Mexico and south in the Americas the 20th Century relationships between Native American populations and the various governments bore little similarity to Canada and the US. This reflects differences between the historical approaches of Hispanic cultural descents and Northern European ones.

Which of these two methods has resulted in the most concrete benefit, affluence, and survival of the peoples of those countries, including those descended from Natives?

depends which Latino country you refer to. In some, Native peoples were (are) quite poorly treated, nd just as likely to face genocidal practices. Certainly Mexico, Brazil and Peru seem to have done better.

bad question; there were more than two approaches.

2009-12-23 05:34:16 by Jack P

Price: $14.95

I never noticed. So many women are built differently. You can see those features in every race, not just native americans. I am part Cherokee, Laponi and Choctaw and never noticed that in any of my female family members on that side of the family. Actually, come to think of it, I do have broad shoulders, but I have a butt to go with it. Many peoples (races) do develop body types over hundreds/thousands of years, depending on the elements/environment they live in.

2006-08-10 13:27:41 by eagle_claw1976

Take the Irish or Irish Americans for example, The potato famine to be more specific. If a people are starving to death in their homeland and they have the means to cross the Atlantic ocean to seek out more fertile soils so they can live, sustain themselves and survive isn't that an instictual right? Isn't survival a basic right, no matter who gets in the way? If native peoples got in their way and they were killed is'nt that justifiable on the basis of the Irish's struggle for food and survival alone? Ask, any Irish American why their people came to the New World and 9 out of 10 times you will hear more fertile soils and survival.. ( also escape the English, but thats something diff than what I'm talking about now ) Comments?
Disagree with this survival argument? Ok, global warming occurs, and the Eastern seaboard is now underwater, and you come looking for higher ground. Well, I live and own the land on the side of a mountain. What should happen to you? Should I accomodate you? Kill you? Global warming has changed everything!
Yokki, Natives and Europeans had fears of each other, that is why people were killed. Its the same reason, I would probably kill you or you kill me - when you show up at my front door on the side of my mountain due to global warming
8dave - YES, and many do everyday! Many refugees come to the USA everyday when they show up on their shoreline.
8dave, also - Slaughter is a strong word.. I really think people died, because people had fear. When you show up on the side of my mountain due to Global Warming.. Guess what? YOU'RE A DEAD MAN!
Yes, Julie... You can try to kill me when you show up on the side of the mountain I own.. Its would I would expect from a European... Don't worry, I'll be prepared!

1. I, personally, did not do anything to them. So, I don't think that I should have to pay for something my ancestors did.
2. Some people forget that although we ARE humans, and thus superior to other animals, we still exist in a state of nature. Doing so means that sometimes the weak will perish. Denying this is silly. Whining about it is just pitiful.

2007-10-04 03:10:19 by Jaime S

Take the Irish or Irish Americans for example, The potato famine to be more specific. If a people are starving to death in their homeland and they have the means to cross the Atlantic ocean to seek out more fertile soils so they can live, sustain themselves and survive isn't that an instictual right? Isn't survival a basic right, no matter who gets in the way? If Native peoples got in their way and they were killed is'nt that justifiable on the basis of the Irish's struggle for food and survival alone? Ask, any Irish American why their people came to the New World and 9 out of 10 times you will hear more fertile soils and survival.. ( also escape the English, but thats something diff than what I'm talking about now ) Comments?
Stiggo-
A ship is sinking and you have the opportunity to get on the life boat, but knock the opportunity for that of a small child.. You take your opportunity and choose life... YOU ARE NOT WRONG for choosing to survive! AND, you are NOT EVIL! You are not selfish...You just want to live, simple!
Stigg-
1st of all, I'm not killing anyone. The boat is sinking! 2nd, wanting to live is not evil! If people would just stop and see things for what they really are! Its like cannabilsm, Freezing to death or eat a dead mans arm to hold out another day and maybe be saved! Look at it for what it is... SURVIVAL!!!!
Susie, you're an idiot! Adding on to your house and starving to death as a people is like comparing an apple to not an orange, but a banana... Americans sieze to amaze at how dumb they actually can be.
Another thing, Susie - I don't think the Irish came here to murder or abuse anyone.. They came so they didn't have to starve to death.. They chose life over death! As far as abuse, and murder - thats what happens people have fear of one another, regardless..
Stiggo-
I guess we should stay out of outer space then? Or, if we go - We should not bring weapons? We may infringe or tamper with another life forms access or ability to survive....

So what you're saying is that your survival is more valid than someone else's survival? If survival is, as you say, a basic right, then clearly you don't have the right to deny someone else that right simply so you can exercise it for yourself. Doing so would seem to be, for lack of a better word, evil. When the Irish came here, they didn't kill the Americans who were already here or force them off their land to ensure their own survival, so your comparison is pointless.

Killing a child so that you can survive is neither evil or selfish in your opinion? That would be a textbook example of both. Just because you want to live doesn't mean that you get to live at all costs and that makes it OK.

All right, fine. Even though I'm amazed at your argument and your inability to see that throwing a child off a lifeboat just so you can live is killing the child and, even if somehow not evil, is still selfish, let's play your game. The people who colonized America and dispossessed and killed the natives were not doing it for their own survival, they were doing it because they wanted the land. End of story. Thus, you cannot assign any morality or necessity to their actions.

2007-10-03 08:55:37 by Jaime S