Survival Signs

I need signs like stop sign, restroom, men women, no right turn, etc.

Check out your local Teachers store.

2007-03-01 13:18:29 by Dayana A

Signs for the beginning of the year in the ASL classroom.

for example : movement and etc

well, there is colonies formed if they survive..

PEACE =D

2008-12-13 00:44:22 by Saber E

Price: $10.99 $9.78

edgy, yelling.hides from society, cant cope in crowds, doesnt make friends well, that type of thing.

2009-08-18 04:23:57 by nutter

"Broken heart" is a representational phrase to describe someone who is extremely sad. Usually it is when they have lost a loved one. Some people get so sad, that they lose the will to live, and die just because their mind wills them to. Because of this, there is no way to say exactly what the "signs" of a broken heart are, nor is there a way to calculate a survival rate, since no one actually gets a heart that is broken.

Now if you want to talk about heart disease, that is another story....

2006-11-02 19:55:18 by ascendent2

Wondering about archaeological digs in the future, say 2000 years from now.

If future archaeologists found symbols of McDonald's everywhere, and since the symbols are so prevalent all over the world, would they think it was a WORLD RELIGION?

Would future archaeologists see company names like, "Mercury" or find police badges with the star (pentagram) on them and determine that we still worshipped pagan gods, 2000 years after we supposedly stopped? Would the police badge be seen as a petition for protection from a pagan god?
I do understand there are neo-pagans (whose spirituality I respect) but most people of Western civilization identify with the Christian religion (for the record, I do NOT).

Would they be in a heated debate over whether Christianity completely wiped out the "old gods", or would the overwhelming symbolism that is still in existence in our culture, be seen as a sign of the survival of their worship with more prevalence than it actually is?

The biggest question is whether archaeologists or historians are going to be studying our civilization 2000 years from now.

For example:
Historians today more than archaeologists study the 19th and 18th century in Europe, because there are numerous written records dating from that period available for research.

Archaeologists today more than historians, study the Mayas, because there are very few written records from that period and most information is gathered by studying ruins and artifacts.

If our current civilization suffers a big natural disaster or widespread calamity such as an epidemic or nuclear war, and most of our written (and electronic) records are either destroyed or the people that understand them (we) die, then future archaeologists are the ones that (probably) will be unearthing our cities and studying our artifacts and reaching conclusions.

If on the contrary, civilization manages to survive in a more or less continuous way during the next 2 millenniums, then probably historians of the future are the ones that will study our times and customs. Maybe only experts would understand our language and our writing, just like only experts can read today a 12th century medieval manuscript, because language will surely have changed by then as well as writing.

2007-08-30 12:25:06 by Geek Girl